The Good Books: White Evangelical Racism
A necessary (not an alternate) history of white evangelicalism
This essay is part of my series on books Iām reading, The Good Books. This week Iām featuring Anthea Butlerās new book, White Evangelical Racism. I will be publishing my interview with Dr. Butler later this week. Subscribe to Exvangelical to make sure you donāt miss it!
Dr. Butler does not waste time, nor should she. White evangelicalism has had ample opportunity to reckon with its history of racism, but has generally demurred. And we honestly canāt afford to waste any more time.
The book begins with āEvangelical Racism: A Feature, Not a Bug,ā and proceeds from there.
Letās be clear at this point in this essay: the reality of racism in white evangelicalism, and in American society-at-large, is no surprise to Black & BIPOC readers. It is their lived experience. Writing as I am from the perspective of a white person, shaped by white evangelicalism, I can certainly tell you that the legacy of racism in white evangelical thought, practice, and belief is obfuscatedāand many evangelicals rest on the laurels of 19th century evangelical abolitionists as if that excuses them from the work of examining racist beliefs in themselves and their contemporary institutions.
Yet it is only white people for whom ignorance acts as a shield. Yet in this day, when we are so broadly aware of one anotherās plights (livestreamed and tweeted, etc as they are), such claims are a pale and sickly excuse.

So white readers (though this book is not written solely for a white audience) have to reckon with what Dr. Butler presents us with. Itās the least we can do.
āEvangelicals are not naĆÆve individualsā
White Evangelical Racism is not preoccupied with the evangelical embrace of Trump, but since we still wrestle with the consequences and implications of the Trump presidency, itās a valuable starting point. Dr. Butler writes:
āEvangelicals are not naĆÆve individuals who were taken advantage of by a slick New York real estate mogul and reality TV star. They were his accomplicesā¦.race and racism have always been foundational parts of evangelicalism in America, fueling its educational, political, social, and cultural mores. Evangelicals occupy an important place in the story of American religionābut they also are key to our nationās politics of now. The set of evangelicals who believed in and continue today to believe in the inferiority of people of color are complicit in supporting structures of oppression that are antithetical to the gospel they claim to believe in.ā
From this vantage point, Dr. Butler removes both ignorance and innocence as excuses for contemporary white evangelicals - and the remainder of the book demonstrates they were never naĆÆve, from the 19th century through to today.
Racist ideas of āorderā
It is the 19th century history of white evangelicalism following the Civil War that will be jarring to many white readers. Weāve sanitized and cherry-picked our collective memory of this time period (especially those outside the South), and are shocked to learn of the role of lynching, and appeals by groups like the KKK and the White League to the āāorderā of the slave-owning South:ā
āIt did not matter that burning churches and murder were crimes. These activities were considered to be in the service of the religious ideal of restoration, of bringing back what white southerners considered the God-given right of white men to rule over allā¦.appeals to violence were couched in the language of ācivilizationā and closely connected to ideas of biblical retribution and Godās favor. The ideal of āorder,ā which would evolve into evangelical calls for ālaw and order,ā stemmed from harmful stereotypes about African Americansā tendency toward violence and the supposed insubordination of people who merely wanted their freedom and their humanity respected.ā
What we can gather from this history is that these racist beliefs and practices were not limited to a single branch of the white evangelical Protestant tree.
Itās not even the roots. It is in the soil.Sometimes we have to sit with that, do the emotional work, and change. No cozy way to tie that up. It will take a lifetime.
Billy Grahamās Gradualism
Following this look at 19th century white evangelicalism, Dr. Butler turns her focus to Jim Crow and the role of Billy Graham. Since his later ministry (especially post-Nixon), Grahamās image has been rehabilitated to appear ānon-partisanā because he courted power under both Republican and Democratic administrations. Butler reframes Graham, stating that āhis brand of Christian fervor, fear, and fatalism defined American evangelicalism from the 1940s to the 1970s. He exemplified a kind of religion that combined Christianity, patriotism, and politics into a potent mix of respectability that was predicated on fear of the other.ā In his way, Graham āsoftenedā fundamentalist racial ideologies āunder the guise of āAmericanistā culture and obedience to the law.ā
Sound familiar?
Graham also conflated the Civil Rights movement with a vague threat of communism (similar to the vague right-wing talking points alleging that BLM is a āradical terroristā or āradical socialistā organization), and believed that only God - not the political and social actions of people, even the people of God - would bring about racial justice. Infamously, following Dr. Martin Luther King, Jrās āDreamā speech in 1963, Graham stated that āit would take the second coming of Christ before we would see white children walk hand in hand with Black children.ā
Iāll leave it to the reader of this essay to pick up the book for more detail on Graham.
The racist origins of the modern Religious Right
If youāve made it to 2021 believing that the modern religious right was motivated by āpro-lifeā anti-choice concerns, well, allow this book to disabuse you of that notion. The real motivation, which has been extensively documented, was to protect the racially exclusionary admissions practices of Christian colleges and schools. Butler writes:
āMany evangelicals and fundamentalists still clung to nineteenth-century beliefs regarding scripture, including admonitions in the Hebrew Bible to Israelites not to mix with āotherā people. In a concession to the times, [Bob Jones University] began to accept students of Asian heritage, but only those who signed the universityās statement of faith promising not to participate in interracial dating. The university board opposed enrolling Black men and women due to concerns about interracial dating and marriage.ā
These practices were challenged many times, but the Green v. Kennedy case found purchase with the IRS commission, and the IRS eventually moved to enforce guidelines that would require a schoolās student population to have 20% minority students in order to maintain tax-exempt status.
Enter Paul Weyrich.
This ruling displeased evangelicals. Weyrich saw an opportunity to animate a large population. And they were animated - evangelicals sent in over 120,00 letters to the IRS in protest of the policy, and the IRS backed off.
Conservatives today bemoan ācancel culture,ā when a mass of people take collective action, even though they have been using similar tactics for 50 years. This history has been obfuscated, in preference for a false narrative that they were motivated to prevent abortion. Not so.
Not persecution. Not ācancellation.ā
Reader, I underlined most of the conclusion of this book. I know I have already quoted liberally from this book, but permit me one final block quote:
Access to power made evangelicalism brittle, and unforgiving. Ideology trumped the gospel. Loving your neighbor turned into loving only those who believe as you do. As a result, evangelicals live in silos to keep themselves pureā¦.as a result, evangelicals are regarded with disdain by the broader public. Evangelicals wear this as a badge of honor and as a sign of persecution of Christians. Evangelicals are not being persecuted in America. They are being called to account.ā
I could not agree more. We are witnessing the end of white evangelical hegemony not because of persecution by āthe world,ā but because they are being judged by their actions. White evangelicalism must reckon with its history of racism. Lord knows the rest of us are.
I spoke with Dr. Butler last year, prior to the publication of her book, on Powers & Principalities. Listen here:
Subscribe to The Post-Evangelical Post to get future editions of The Good Books and more:
I think of Michael Gersonās evangelical lament in The Atlantic in 2018, where he uses this very tactic:
āMy alma mater, Wheaton College, was founded by abolitionist evangelicals in 1860 under the leadership of Jonathan Blanchard, an emblematic figure in mid-19th-century Northern evangelicalism. Blanchard was part of a generation of radical malcontents produced by the Second Great Awakening, a religious revival that had touched millions of American lives in the first half of the 19th century. He was a Presbyterian minister, a founder of several radical newspapers, and an antislavery agitator.ā
To which I say: š I also had a minisode about it, after it was published:
Methodists and Episcopalians donāt get off scot-free by scapegoating Southern Baptists or Presbyterians. All traditions are complicit.
(This is a simplification - read the book for all the details.)